الأحد، 22 مايو 2011

jeff dunham peanut doll

jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%


  • dr_lha
    Oct 18, 04:31 PM
    Nice bump in the stock...AAPL up 5.5% in after hours trading.
    Expect it to take a dump tomorrow morning.




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%


  • hayesk
    Mar 29, 08:11 PM
    So the reason apple charges more is because??? Seems like google is a better deal.

    1. Professional conferences cost that much.
    2. Apple sends 1000 of their engineers that you can talk with. Who is Google sending? How accessible are they?
    3. WWDC is more days.

    Number 2 above is one of the reasons that it would be difficult to move to a larger venue. It might accommodate more people, but the real value is getting to talk with Apple engineers and ask questions. If they made the venue larger, your chances of getting to talk with them becomes slim. It's a tough problem to solve.




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%


  • bousozoku
    Jul 26, 09:20 PM
    Well Apple is using Intel parts now that explains the lower quality. They're taking their parts from the same bin now; quality suffers... :mad:

    Their quality was suffering before the move to Intel processors. Ever seen an iBook G3 or iBook G4 in a store for over 2 months? The keycaps are lying all over the place.

    Apple have not been interactively checking on the quality and demanding changes quickly enough to suit their problems. Also, the other companies have problems but because they don't have such a presence as a market leader, only Apple's problems reliably make front page news.




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%


  • CPngN
    Mar 31, 02:57 PM
    I am not too keen on this "cartoony" 3D effect Apple seem to be going for.

    Torn off pages� faux-leather binding� I mean doesn't anyone else think it is a bit corny?
    It really does seems as if the cutesyeness of the iOS is spreading over to OSX.

    I'd prefer a clean modern OS with usability first and foremost.

    Screw the gratuitous eyecandy�

    Remind anyone of OS/2 and their cheesy waste-of-screen-realestate spiral binder stuff?

    As a theming option, sure, cool, welcome to last decade Apple. If they're going to force these silly looks randomly per app, booo! But the Mac apps looking like iOS apps is inevitable.. in a few years they will probably all be 1 in the same.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%


  • Shambles
    May 4, 11:59 AM
    Good news to be honest. It'll give me more time to get a job and get some money together. :)




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%


  • Lennholm
    Apr 22, 10:28 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

    This is a new low for Samsung. Apple had a specific complaint about a specific device. Now Samsung replies with this patent nonsense? Really it makes Samsung look desperate and weak.

    I bet one day in the near future Samsung will regret this move. Apple will source other fabs for their business. Micron, AMD's spun-off foundry, heck even Intel would probably work something out just for Intel. These American companies wouldn't steal Apple's IP.

    Patent nonsense? Do you know what claims Samsung are making? You know, Samsung has alot of technological patents, technologies that the end user knows and cares little about.
    We can all see that the Galaxy S look strikingly similar to the 3GS (both look cheap imho) but it's hard for us to see if Apple simply stole technologies from Samsung and put it under the hood)
    This doesn't necessarily make Samsung look desperate and week, maybe they up til now simply didn't care that their patents were infringed upon since they felt they had a great collaboration with Apple but when Apple all of sudden decides to pull this off; no more mr nice guy.
    Don't be so quick to make assumptions.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%


  • UniPro
    Mar 15, 11:01 AM
    Wow I'm sorry for everyone who left empty handed. I can't believe apple stores would open early just for 4 iPads. So pointless.




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%


  • dvdgorila
    Sep 14, 09:21 PM
    Jigsaw?? Is that you?! :eek:

    ROFLMAO



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%


  • emaja
    Mar 10, 05:25 PM
    I have stayed out of this one for a while, but now he has gone from "sick" to "awesome" with this video on Funny or Die.

    http://FunnyOrDie.com/m/5cwg




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%


  • Evangelion
    Jul 12, 01:29 AM
    wireless (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Wi-Max whatever)? I used to think that this was a cool thing to have in an iPod. an iPod with internet radio capability sounds like a really cool idea. I'm lukewarm about now.

    I'm not. What would I like to see from Apple? What would my ideal iPod be like? Let's explore the possibilities.

    Bluetooth-headphones. This would kick ass. No more wires that get tangled up. And it CAN be done!

    Large touch-screen. No separate controls, the controls would be right in the display (like in the image that was linked before in this thread).

    And before you say "but there would be fingerprints on the screen! And it wouldn't provide any tactile feedback!". Ah, but how about that "no-touch" controls that have been rumored? I have no idea that is it really possible, but what if? You could simply hover you finger 1cm from the screen and use the controls. No fingerprints. As to the tactile feedback.... Tactile feedback is used that you know where the controls are without actually looking at the screen. "No-touch" UI does not have this, because you aren't actually touching anything. So how do we make this work? Well, what if you could just put your finger close to the screen ANYWHERE on the screen. If you do circlular motion (like in current iPod) the device would scroll, adjust volume, and do the other things you can do on the current iPod. If you move your finger straigh up, it would be equivaltnof clicking "menu". Straight down would be play/pause and so forth.

    As to WLAN and the like.... What if the new iPod could be tied to iChat? You could VOIP to/from the iPod. just turn on the wireless, and browse to the "buddy list" menu on your iPod, and you are all set. Hell, the iPod could have a camera as well! if they can put video-cameras on phones, is there any reason why iPod couldn't have one?

    if we assume that the "no-touch" UI is possible, then nothing I have listed is impossible. iPod with those specs would be YEARS ahead of any other device on the market! It would absolutely embarrass all the other devices.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%


  • kevin.rivers
    Jul 28, 10:42 AM
    How can you possibly make that statement - that no one is switching to Zune ( or will switch to )

    Zune isn't out yet!!!


    If you hated DRM would you switch to a Zune? It is common sense. MS is doing the same thing that Apple is. And people already hate the iPod... Besides you have nothing else to offer to this besides a play on words?




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%


  • arn
    Apr 28, 06:50 PM
    Better comparison picture

    http://www.tipb.com/2011/04/28/white-iphone-4-roughly-02mm-thicker-black-iphone/

    As mentioned, difference is 0.2mm.

    http://images.macrumors.com/article/2011/04/28/195018-white_iPhone_depth-036.jpg



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%


  • goodcow
    Jun 6, 01:11 PM
    This is like the risk of using the 1-Click Ordering feature at amazon.com.

    Not really, because you can refuse delivery of a package for a full refund off Amazon. Digital content like Apps are generally non-refundable.




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%


  • MacRumors
    Jul 10, 09:48 AM
    http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)

    Alongside the introduction of 'Charts' (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/07/20060709121223.shtml), ThinkSecret is reporting (http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0607pages3.html) that Apple will be introducing a number of new features into the next version of Pages.

    Pages is Apple's word processing application which comes bundled in iWork (http://guides.macrumors.com/iWork). Pages 3 is expected to debut in January 2007 with the release of iWork '07. New features include two new modes called "Word Processing" and "Layout" to better cater to different users needs.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%


  • Komentra
    Apr 14, 02:02 PM
    It's not a bug.

    You had to manually tick a box which counted Home Sharing play counts on the iTunes overall one.

    Even with it ticked it still doesn't update play counts. That's where the bug is.
    Tried it on OS X and Windows and still doesn't work. I've heard it works fine from computers and Apple TV but on devices it doesn't even though it's suppose to.

    EDIT: Got a post over on the official Apple forums discussing it and it has a lot of replies of people reporting the exact same thing. I haven't even found a single person who has said it works.

    By the way if anyone who has updated to 4.3.2 and would like to test it and let me know if it's fixed that'd be awesome. :D




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%


  • maccompaq
    Feb 1, 09:45 AM
    iPhone4 charger for my car.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%


  • mrial
    Apr 14, 09:34 AM
    So guys, I'm already queuing up for my ix.Mac.MarketingName. I think I'm the first! Tent and camping gear ready.

    Heard Best Buy were holding some back because quota already met.




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%


  • Prom1
    Oct 19, 02:01 AM
    Quite a bit here. And this coming from Proud Mac owners, and Apple supporters.

    1 > The Intel CPU or platform change is gonna make HUGE strides over to Mac OS X. Multiple OS' on one machine is just pure bliss. I've got 3 ppl at work considering the switch all because of the XEON cpu & the ability to run 3 OS (MS Vista, Linux of their choice, and finally MAC OS X); but their just considering because they'll need to upgrade their hardware regardless.

    2> The MacBook Pro is due for a case colour change or revision. Its basically the PowerBook G4's case with an iSight, save for MagLite and few other things. But what will Apple make of the case? Polycarbonate, Magnesium Alloy with carbonfibre chassis? Better heat dissappation?

    3> Mac Pro; great case. Its not gonna change anytime soon, and I for one realize its Apple's Monolith machine. Heck if you dont want your G5 PowerMac or Mac Pro I'll be more than gratuitous in receiving it as a hand-me-down.

    4> I think this qtr we'll see a slowdown of iPod Nano sales due to the new aluminum enclosure, doesnt have that esthetic appeal to it; but its personal preference.

    With MW07 quickly approaching, I think the Mac Pro will get significant sales from those that are waiting, due to recent purchases - cleaning out their old G4 PowerMac closets to make way for new Xeon Core 2 Duo machines.

    With Vista awaiting to be released, I really think Apple should align their Marketing campaign to be double sided. Either cheeky to poke fun at lack of innovation and revolution to the Vista OS - but NOT at the user! Remember its actually a benefit that the end user can use the Mac Pro or Mac Book series & iMac to install Vista should the user choose to. Market this as a choice something the end user doesnt get at the office ;) Secondly I think Apple should REALLY push the features, power, security, frequent updates to improve an owners system, ALL as a viable reason to own & use both the Mac & OS X! I thought OS X is supposed to sell the hardware, well damnit Apple ADVERTISE IT!

    Bring in the big guns Apple to SHOW consumers, small business', family's etc. Get Software companies to advertise how powerful, efficient and productive their products are. How efficient users are USING the Mac. Come up with a low budget, effective direct perspective of how the Mac OS X is. Appeal to the IT Professional, appeal to the family, appeal to the rebel youth, appeal to the manager of a SOHO business, highlight business partners success that use your hardware to make their success.




    jeff dunham peanut doll. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%


  • mrblah
    Jul 26, 07:43 PM
    A tower is more disirable to people who are new to computers because it looks like youre getting more for your money. Obviously this doesnt apply to everyone, and saying such sacrilige on a Mac forum is going to get a lot of strange looks since the audience would be part of the "not everyone" crowd. But if you actually look at what SELLS rather than what you think people want then youll see that towers are the most sought after among the people looking for maximum value rather than style. People dont care what their computers look like, if they did then why would Dell have such a big market share with their ass ugly cases? PC's arent a fashion statement, theyre a tool. PowerMacs are absurdly priced and will never make a dent in the market share, so those are only options for rich people or enthusiasts that are willing to pay such prices.

    Regardless of anyones opinion on how perfect iMacs are for new computer users, new computer users dont see it that way. They want value and upgradability since that means even more value in the long run. They dont know if they are going to upgrade anything in the future, the fact is that they buy a computer THINKING they will. You cant expect these people to know what you know, or to know that Apple has better quality parts than Dell or HP, they look at things and see computers and thats it. Not Windows, not OSX, just computers with already high prices.




    bpaluzzi
    Apr 14, 10:24 AM
    Besides the arguments about this not really making sense from a business perspective, I'm not sure how it would work from a set-up perspective.

    So you have the Apple TV built-in. Great. So you get your programs direct to your TV. Great. Except that you don't want the audio there. You want the audio in your receiver, so you can power your surround system. So now you're running a wire out of the TV and into your receiver. God, how clunky.

    This is why a set-top box makes MUCH more sense. One wire out of the box goes into either your TV directly (if it's a small system, bedroom set, etc.), or direct into your receiver, where the audio and video can be handled correctly.

    Content in a "living room" TV just doesn't make sense to me. It's one of the reasons (IMO) why you don't see integrated DVD players on big tvs (where they'll be used with a full surround system), but you do see them on small "bedroom" TVs.

    Dunno... am I the only one thinking this?




    princealfie
    Oct 23, 12:26 PM
    Disgusting. I think that I'm going to get some sushi instead. No rules there...




    Metatron
    Sep 29, 10:31 PM
    You think it is bad for iPhone users only....with my company's massive (thousands) number of blackberries with AT&T, not to mention aircards, the iPhone's massive use of bandwidth and cell saturation is hurting more than itself.




    Rot'nApple
    Apr 23, 10:13 PM
    C'mon Apple, show T-Mobile some love'n...

    Maybe I'll buy my first ever iPhone!... But not in too much of a rush... Just purchased a MBA this past November, my first ever laptop... before that the 3G 64GB iPad 1 in June... and just got my iMac repaired to the tune of $200 bucks... so I can wait for either T-Mo to get their version of the iPhone or the merger with ATT to gain access, while I pay off my Apple debt and saving some dinero for some more Apple goodies! :apple::cool:




    Consultant
    Apr 14, 12:27 PM
    At this rate jailbreakers will never catch up.



    ليست هناك تعليقات:

    إرسال تعليق