السبت، 21 مايو 2011

johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world

johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%


  • opeter
    Mar 31, 10:31 AM
    It would be nice, if the user could change the windows (UI) color in MacOS X like this can already be done in Windows / Linux.

    So, that you could change the grey look to something else. They could integrate the color chooser, like you have, when you work with fonts etc.

    After all, Mac is sold to consumers, so why not give them the choise of colors, at least in their programs, if their computers are cold/neutrla grey/silver/white colored?




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%


  • renewed
    Sep 14, 12:04 PM
    Wait till you get that platinum card !

    [/IMG]

    I actually want the Lutetium card.

    http://www.webpagefx.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/coffee-buzz.jpg




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%


  • clintob
    Oct 23, 04:07 PM
    This is actually an incorrect report that Microsoft has tried to correct, but it keeps getting reported.

    Not exactly. This is a correct report that Microsoft has tried to cloud and cover up. Essentially, Vista will be licensed on a two-machine basis, with some basic restrictions (like all software has). Nothing new there.

    What's new, and what is actually a correct report, is that MS has addressed the use of their OS in a virtual environment which was never completely addressed before in their EULA and terms of use. Because virtual environments are technically different than system installs, it was a grey area. Now they are explicitly banning such use for users of any version other than the premium level. Whether or not it will be "technically" illegal, but still possible, or if it will be impossible without piracy, remains to be seen.

    It's not particularly earth shattering or shocking one way or the other. All companies have their dirty little ways to make an extra buck or keep you paying them long after you should. Apple does it too.

    From a business perspective, it's really not a terrible strategy by MS if they want to keep customers. The Intel Mac switch has opened the door for PC diehards to take the plunge to a Mac without the risk of being away from their cherished Windows environment. Making Vista difficult, or at least expensive, to install on these new Macs is actually not a bad strategy for MS to keep some customers iffy about making the switch. Sucks for us, but it's certainly not the first time it's been done, by MS, Apple, Adobe, or any other company.




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%


  • Burgess07
    Apr 15, 06:05 PM
    Thank god, I wasn't fond of the new style. I found it kinda confusing and out of place.

    Best news ever. I hope they roll it back in other menu's as well.

    yay!

    Apparently I'm one of the few who liked the new slider buttons.



    more...

    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%


  • rayz
    Aug 1, 12:20 AM
    He was talking about seeing blue screens. So it doesn't matter how many people would register it as a crash....they still wouldn't see a blue screen. That was the point he was trying to make.

    Yep. I got that; I was saying that the reason you don't see it is not because they've hidden it; it's because XP is actually a lot more stable. Crashes these days are pretty rare, and are usually caused by attempts to access strange areas of memory, or driver problems. I have an XP box running a couple of web containers, and a few app servers; aside from a driver hiccup, never had a crash or secret reboot (and I would know, because I would still need to log back in when I got back from the water cooler).

    Also, just as a side note...it took them three years to create the version you're talking about. I'm not stating this for argument—it's only here as additional info.

    ... and it took Apple just as long to create a stable version of OSX; the only real difference was that MS didn't charge for the interim versions. Again, just additional info.




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%


  • m-dogg
    Aug 15, 03:02 PM
    I like the safari updates like the warnings and ability to consolidate tabs into one window. Those are some little things I've wished for.

    There are some add-on's available to accomodate some of these today, but I'm happy to see them finally being integrated into the app itself.



    more...

    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%


  • SeanZy
    Mar 15, 10:10 AM
    Just got here to Brea an there's about 20 or so in line. Hopefully we can get some update on inventory levels. They didn't sell any yesterday but I don't know if that's because they didn't get any or chose to hold them for today.

    Good luck everyone!

    I am also in line at brea. About 11th in line... Using the white one I already got haha. Waiting for a friend




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%


  • saving107
    Apr 14, 02:14 PM
    Can anyone comment on the animation performance of the Iphone 4?

    It hasn't been fixed.



    more...

    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%


  • dugbug
    Jun 6, 01:24 PM
    Sad thing is the developer is now going to be charged $300 (Apple requires the developer to reimburse the user Apple's commission).




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%


  • AppleIntelRock
    Dec 1, 05:56 PM
    it's time for apple to really make osx more secure then windows.



    more...

    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%


  • jiminaus
    May 3, 08:16 AM
    expensive, why not go MBP + nice LED Screen + SSD?
    MBP doesn't have a fast enough GPU. I use my iMac primarily for development. Need raw GHz, not so much multiple-cores.


    if you are selling 24", it will go for dirt

    Won't sell it. It'll be handed down to family.




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%


  • jasonxneo
    Apr 13, 07:36 PM
    It doesn't really matter at this point. Black or white, it's the iPhone. It'll still sell out.

    yah the white iPhone looks fresh as hell!



    more...

    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%


  • Some_Big_Spoon
    Apr 13, 02:23 PM
    Probably been said, but Apple should liscense airplay to tv makers. All the benefit, none of the risk.




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%


  • Mac'nCheese
    Apr 14, 04:37 PM
    I hope nobody buys any white iphones. The whole thing just annoys me for some reason.



    more...

    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%


  • AtHomeBoy_2000
    Jul 21, 11:01 AM
    I work for a company called Prime Alliance Solutions and our entire company is migrating from Windows machine to macs running Parallels. We are also changing out our windows servers to a to Xserves. Most of the users have never used macs before but overall they have had an excellent experience!!! :) ... Things are changing specially if our Windows Centric Business is willing to go all Mac! I am soo stoked for APPLE!!

    I'm holding off until WWDC to decide what route of "Mac conversion" I am going to be using. If Leopard has a built in Parallels type solution (which I believe it will), then I will absolutely begin my church's mac conversion in January.




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%


  • deputy_doofy
    Apr 28, 10:56 AM
    .....About the the mentality of the people who buy a two year old phone just so they can say they have an iPhone.

    Not much different than people who get cheap/free (and crappy) Android phones to say they have a phone that's "good enough as the iPhone." And those phones, though they may be recently manufactured, generally run Android 1.6-2.0. Not exactly high quality...



    more...

    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%


  • aperry
    Apr 26, 12:41 PM
    Raise a glass to the home server!

    Many of us have been streaming our music for years.




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%


  • Surely
    Feb 25, 09:50 AM
    That`s not a sit-com, it`s a fly on the wall documentary :D

    It's not a sitcom, because:

    sitcom = situational comedy

    That show is/was not funny.




    johnny depp pirates of the caribbean at world. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%


  • Thomas Veil
    Mar 8, 02:10 PM
    Wow- thanks for the compliment. That was very nice. Yeah, he was a very difficult person to deal with.You're quite welcome.

    I watched it once and was also amazed it was so popular. It's so run-of-the-mill.I love Maher, but most lame comedy ever? What about Me and the Chimp, It's About Time, Captain Nice, The Lucy Show, Family Matters, Webster, and Glenn Beck?

    I would like to see them pull off a change of actor for once, without changing the character. I think it's an insult to the audience's intelligence that networks think we can't accept someone else in the role. They always go for the knee-jerk reaction, which is to kill off the character. Give us some credit, and a chance for another actor to make the role his own. It's not like it's unheard of. How many James Bonds have there been??




    fyrefly
    Apr 20, 01:32 AM
    We now have some actual game results now and it seems even worse than the 50% drop seen in the original review.

    Instead of 50% of the performance of the 320M, we now have:
    26% at a lower resolution in Wow
    34% for Lost planet

    Those numbers seem to suggest the ULV SAndy Bridge has even worse graphics performance than the previous generation Nvidia 9400M

    Gaming performance. Not graphics performance. Don't confuse the two.

    Engadget's review said the Intel IGP made short work of 1080p HD clips, so regarding pushing pixels (that aren't games) the HD 3000 seems on par at doing that as the 320m.

    Also, I'd venture to day the HD 3000 graphics drivers are more advanced in OSX than they are in Windows.

    The same mysterious drop in Gaming performance was seen in Windows vs. OSX in the Anandtech review of the 13" 2011 MBP (http://www.anandtech.com/show/4205/the-macbook-pro-review-13-and-15-inch-2011-brings-sandy-bridge/7):

    "Under OS X, the new HD Graphics 3000 GPU is actually about the same performance or even faster than the 2010 13-inch's GeForce 320M. Remember that Apple does a lot of its own driver writing under OS X and the SNB GPU received some TLC from Apple in the form of very well optimized drivers."

    And yes, I know the MBP uses a fully clocked IGP and the MBA probably won't.

    But if even a fully clocked IGP sucks in Windows and works almost on par with the 320m in OSX, then I'd like to at least see the LV HD3000 benchmarks in OSX before making a final judgement.

    it is only 29min. Not sure where you get almost 1 hour from. And it was measured in Windows, so I think this is the most comparable number. Mac OS is known to be better at using less power than Windows. From this, I'd say there would be a marginal increase in battery life by switching to Sandy Bridge - nothing major.

    Hah. My bad. I was adding like adding, and not like time adding.

    I'd take even a marginal increase in battery life, though, who wouldn't?

    And I'd also venture to say that Apple's doing better at battery life than most other manufacturers. The 13" 2011 MBP added 10W to it's TDP and (like you say below) Sandy Bridge seems like it's sneaky with it's turbo boosting - and still the 2011 MBP gets better battery life than it's C2D+320m sibling from last year.

    TDP is not the whole story .. for example the 2011 i7 2.3Ghz Sandy Bridge Quad Core is supposed to have a TDP of 45W, which is 10W more than the i7
    2.66Ghz 2010 model. However, Anandtech measured the 2011 machine using almost 40W more running a CPU intensive task. Something is very weird about the Sandy Bridge TDP numbers.

    Hmm, interesting, I hadn't seen that comparison yet (http://www.anandtech.com/show/4205/the-macbook-pro-review-13-and-15-inch-2011-brings-sandy-bridge/14).

    The GPU must come into play in both those test, however... so 45W + 25W = 70W out of the 93W used are accounted for in TDP.

    And the 13" MBP pulls 48W instead of it's 35W TDP. It's interesting.

    I wish we had seen comparable numbers for the current MBA. Does it pull more than advertised under load? How much? If not, why not? Is turbo boost to blame?

    My point was based purely on TDP and not high-end scenarios, the battery life should be longer. Wireless web surfing is how Apple measures it now - and I couldn't see the SL9400/9600+320m combo posting better battery numbers in a wireless web test than the i5/HD3000 combo? That leads me to say unless one was doing high-end Rendering with their MBA - the general web-surfing, itunes playing, facebook-checking Mac user will not see anymore than the ~20W TDP come into play, giving that user longer battery life, no?




    QCassidy352
    Apr 15, 06:20 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8H7)

    4.3.2 feels smoother to me. Take that with as many grains of sand as you like.

    Definitely agree. I don't know about the 3rd part app bug, but the UI feels a lot better (eg home screen appearing after you slide to unlock)




    Snowy_River
    Jul 26, 06:08 PM
    Just touching it is not tactile feedback. That would be like saying a piece of paper provides feedback if you touch it. Feedback means a signal is sent back to the user to acknowledge the the pressing of the control. The 3G iPod buttons gave an audio click - that is aural feedback. They also showed things on the screen - that is visual feedback. But they didn't spring, or have a physical barrier that you push through, so there was no tactile feedback (i.e. nothing that can be physically felt) to let you know that you pressed the button.

    tactile |?taktl; ?tak?t?l|
    adjective
    � of or connected with the sense of touch
    � perceptible by touch or apparently so; tangible
    � designed to be perceived by touch

    Tactile means that you touch it! If you touch something you get a tactile feedback from it, unless your finger is numb. Thus, if you're waving you hand over control, you get no tactile feedback. Whereas, even if the control doesn't push in, the simple act of touching a control does give tactile feedback. (Perhaps less tactile feedback than a control that does push in, but it still gives tactile feedback.)

    When you press a button on a dead iPod, it does nothing, and it feels exactly the same as pressing a button on a working iPod - no tactile feedback.

    Irrelevant. If you push a key on the keyboard of a dead computer it behaves the same as pressing the key on the keyboard of a working computer. So, by your logic, these keys that press down give no tactile feedback.

    Who said it was revolutionary? And it could consitute a none-touch interface. It depends on if the patent is describing the control or the entire iPod. If there is a cover, you are not touching the control (the screen underneath), but the cover over it - hence none-touch.

    My point was not to say that your suggestion was not possible, just that it was a small step above what already exists, as opposed to a revolutionary leap forward based on the description in the patent. Of course, for anyone who knows a little bit about patent writing and patent law, what's written in the patent is probably the broadest possible applications that Apple can think of to include in their patent.

    A better (i.e. more scratch-proof) cover would be better. Who cares about fingerprints? You can clean those off. I don't want to hover my finger over something to control it - I'd always have to be careful not to touch the screen (unless it was durable). Not very good when on a bus, train etc., where the vehicle is shaking.

    And if a better material were easily available, don't you think they'd be using it? :rolleyes:




    ivladster
    Mar 31, 08:31 PM
    265 negatives. 95 positives.

    Wow, tough crowd.

    IMO it doesn't look THAT bad. You all have to understand Apple is really pushing hard to get (iOS) iPad users to switch to OS X for their desktop needs as opposed to Windows switches. There are so many iOS features that are being built-in, I guess Apple figures they'll add the same visual cues in their applications to make it a simpler transition.

    It's funny though, the OS itself is more monochrome this time around, but their applications are much more...."festive". :|

    -Stell

    The audience here are the most toughest critics, but general public will appreciate the changes.
    I personally see nothing wrong with making software look like a real thing. It's one of the most natural user interfaces because people know how to use books, paper, and folder tabs.




    arkitect
    Mar 31, 10:29 AM
    I am not too keen on this "cartoony" 3D effect Apple seem to be going for.

    Torn off pages… faux-leather binding… I mean doesn't anyone else think it is a bit corny?
    It really does seems as if the cutesyeness of the iOS is spreading over to OSX.

    I'd prefer a clean modern OS with usability first and foremost.

    Screw the gratuitous eyecandy…



    ليست هناك تعليقات:

    إرسال تعليق